Dr. Wade Silverman, Ph.D | home
False Memories and Forensic Practice I
In 1998, the American Psychological Association working group on the
investigation of memories of childhood abuse published a report aimed at
educating the field as to what is known in this controversial area. The
committee consisted of researchers and clinicians. They agreed on five
essential points 1) child abuse is a pervasive problem generally
unacknowledged, 2) most people who were abused as children remember what
happened, 3) there is a possibility that forgotten events can be remembered,
4) it is also possible that pseudomemories for events that never occurred can
be "recalled", and 5) we have more to learn about how accurate and inaccurate
memories are constructed.
The panel also had some major differences that split clinicians and
researchers. These two camps have strikingly different approaches toward
conceptualizations of false versus true memory. Researchers are critical of
practitioners for not being sensitive to techniques that may implant
suggestions. They also fault clinicians for not being knowledgeable about how
memory works. On the other hand, practitioners feel that researchers are not
educated nor do they have practical experience in techniques that clinicians
find effective in treating trauma survivors. Inherent in these conclusions is
that clinicians feel researchers are not sensitive enough to the true
prevalence of childhood sexual abuse whereas researchers think clinicians
over-estimate its occurrence. The controversy over the prevalence of false
memory versus actual child abuse remains great. It will take more research
before the field is confident in its conclusions. In the next issue we will
consider what is known in terms of implications for forensic practice.
|